Uncategorized

What limits us?

Several months ago I was diagnosed with a thyroid condition, and in the grand tradition of obese folks every where I bounced around doing the “I knew it!” dance.  In fact, according to the Dr., my numbers three years ago are considered treatable by today’s standards.

So – a pill or two later, and an adjustment last week to a strong dose, and I’m still hovering at the same weight I’ve been at for much of the last few years.  I work out several times a week (have a Bodybug to prove it!) and eat reasonably well.  Still… nada.

I’m not frustrated though.  Part of it is knowing that I must be doing something because I’m up to 25 laps in the pool and 30 min on the exercise bike.  Sometimes on the same day!  I’m just wondering what is it that is limiting me so.  Is it attitude?  Is it fear?  If the physical is in check – then perhaps I need to look more deeply at the emotional.  Or the spiritual.

I will confess to some frustration when it comes to the workings of my body.  I did some damage to my knee several weeks ago while in Minneapolis, and it still isn’t right.  Heck, sometimes it HURTS.  The Doc pronounced it a sprain – but if it continues any longer, I many go back and suggest he try again.

The thing is, I know I hurt it while walking – and I pushed myself HARD.  I broke through some of my preconceived limits (and apparently, I broke *me*).

The lesson I learn from this is that I need to stretch my limits before breaking them.  And that goes for the emotional and spiritual as well.  This is no walk to Damascus – with larger-than-life consequences.  This is taking everything, EVERYTHING, one step at a time.  And this blog?  It’s how I plan on mapping out the territory.

Seven Sins? No thank you… I’ve got mine already.

I’m working my way through the Seven Deadly Sins.

(No, not literally.  Although the crepes at the Coffee Beanery are the sort of thing that could easily lead to gluttony.)

Of course, the Seven Deadly Sins are an interesting construct – one which has developed over time to include everything from acedia to vainglory (not quite a to z… but you get the picture).  Various theologians have added and subtracted from the catalog of vices provided by Paul in various letters.  Throughout history the sins have been assigned colors, animal symbols (pig=gluttony) and have even been pictured as women.  (Hmmm… misogyny isn’t a sin?).

From time to time there have been “counters” offered – the opposite, if you will.  Or a corrective measure suggested… such as those guilty of Lust will suffer an eternity of an ice bath in Hell.

So much consideration of what sin is, and what it is not… and of course the idea that some sins are deadlier than others (not in the Reformed understanding)… seems to be good fodder for a Lenten series.  Throw in that several of the lectionary readings seem to have a direct connection with the infamous seven, and we have a sermon series.

It all begs the question of personal sin… what do you own as your own issue?  How does it affect your life and relationships?  What have you done to counter it?  What are you being called to do about it?

As for me?

:::looks longingly at the crêpe before me:::

I think I know where this Lent will lead *me*.

You know you’re absentminded when…

…you think to yourself, “I should really start another blog” and then you think “I don’t think I’ve tried WordPress” and then you find out that you already have an existing blog on said site.

My bad.

I’m not sure what drives an individual to publicly blog – although I think my impetus is generally related to my need to sort something out.  Writing as therapy, as you will.

So today’s impetus?

Haiti.  Pat Robertson’s comments.  Roselle schools (the High School = epic fail).  The Presbytery’s new Interim Executive.  My own ennui.

And the desire to wrap the world in yarn and protect it and keep it warm.

**

This Sunday’s lectionary reading is the Wedding at Cana.  There’s Jesus, and Mom, and an apparent lack of wine.  A request, and a wave of the wand, and the wedding party can now party like it’s 1999.

And this is the Jesus I want this minute.  The spandex-clad superhero who can make the earth stop shaking and the idiots stop talking and make everything better so I can sleep at night.

THIS is my own private magic-using Man who can right the wrong in the world so I don’t have to.

Then I read the passage again.

First of all – there’s little spandex, and no leaping over buildings.  Instead there’s the mother telling the servants to do what He tells them to do.

Rats.  Superman’s mother never says anything like this.

Come to think of it, none of the Superfriends seem to need the help of mere mortals.

Then we (of course it is “we”… who did you THINK the servants were?) are told to fill these empty water jars with water.  Of course, they’re not any sort of jars.  They are specifically used for one purpose.

The Women’s Association isn’t going to like this.

Only after they are filled with water – filled to overflowing – and offered to the steward does it become apparent that something has changed.  Pots set aside for one specific ritual purpose are now used for a Par-tay.

And we helped.  Heck, we did the grunt work.

And that remains our call.  To be the hands that lift the stone, and shut the mouth of Robertson and his ilk… to fix the schools and to motivate the church and…

There’s no magic.

There’s us… following the One who directs us in how to go about making change and encouraging us to move forward.

There’s no magic Man.

But there is Jesus…. and a grand party when the work is done.  It’s enough.

Minding the Gap

Minding the Gap

On the train home from the city (THE city, mind you) yesterday, we rode on one of the new double-decker trains.  I sat comfortably behind a giggling girlchild and her best-friend-of-the-moment.  My role was utilitarian.  I was the financier and the chauffer for this grand birthday event. 

 

We had lunch at the Hard Rock Cafe, and then the two girls saw ‘Spring Awakening’ while I found a bench nearby where I could sit and knit.  The girlchild and her best-friend-of-the-moment (you know, they need to develop a phrase as catchy as BFF!  BFoTM! doesn’t work nearly as well.) ignored me completely the entire day, unless money was needed.

 

Sitting behind them, watching the world flow by, I was caught by the rhythm of the train and the sounds that accompanied it.  At every stop this wonderfully sonorous, somewhat mechanical female voice would announce the station, followed by ‘watch the gap’. 

 

In England it is ‘mind the gap’, and personally that works better for me.  To ‘mind’ something isn’t to simply to see it, but to obey it in the same way that you ‘mind your manners’.  It is introspection of a sort, which brings about a change in behavior.

 

When I’m told to ‘mind my manners’, I’m being told to see what I am doing and to reflect on the appropriateness of my actions and to change them if necessary.  When I’m told to ‘mind the gap’ it is to do the same.  To see, reflect, and adapt.

 

On the train home from the city (THE city, mind you) yesterday, I found myself minding another gap.  This gap isn’t painted with yellow paint cautioning me to be careful in my steps, nor am I reminded of its existence by an ever-patient announcer.  No, it’s the gap that exists between my daughter and I, a gap brought about by raging hormones and differing priorities.  And I do mind it.  I ‘mind the gap’ by being aware of it, and reflecting on it, and changing my own responses based on what I see.

 

The fact is that the gap is increasing, making it easier to see (if not easier to mind). I find myself watching her – waiting for those rare moments when I see the baby and child she once was.  There are flickering moments when she is what she once was, and other moments that suggest the wonderful woman she is becoming.  Most of the time, however, the gap is gaping and ever-present.  There are times when I reflect that there isn’t a bridge in the world (even if I could suspend my disbelief) that would allow me to cross.

 

And that is as it should be.

 

We’ve raised her to be a fiercely independent young woman in a diverse community.  She’s at the point in her life when she needs to wander a bit from what is her established home.  She is in a place where peer relationships, even those best-friends-of-the-moment, are critical.  I know this.

 

I also mind this.

 

For although we’ve been working towards the moment when she is capable of living on her own, we have been soley focusing on her.  This gap is created by her moving away – first emotionally, then physically – and our remaining here.  I need to focus a bit more inwardly – to ‘mind the gap’ more intentionally – and to trust that the foundation we’ve laid these many years will be enough.

The train pulls up to our station and my daughter reacts to my tapping her on the shoulder with scorn.  “I know, Mom” she states with her patented eye-roll.  They get off the train behind me, taking their time as we walk towards the car.  Someday soon she’ll be walking to her own car, and I won’t be in the story at all.

 

Somehow I’ll find a way not to mind it.

Re-upholstering

I’ve got a Victorian sofa in my backyard, covered with a blue tarp.

It’s in the backyard, because it is no longer on the front porch – and it is no longer on the front porch because there are contractors buzzing around my house sanding away all the old paint on this old house.

I picked up the couch via Freecycle a year or so ago, hoping that I could restore it.  If not, there was little loss.  The couch was free and I have most of the fabric and such available.  The cost would be minimal – new stuffing.  It’s been sitting there waiting for me to find the time to do it, as well as the inclination.

I’ve done some re-upholstering before.  It’s facinating and frustrating all at the same time.  Generally with the older pieces there are layers upon layers of patch jobs done by amateurs such as myself.  In one piece (the chair in my living room) I knew that my grandmother had put in one layer, and because I knew the story of this chair, I imagined that it was her neighbor who had the layer before that.  It’s archaeology meets forensics meets Joann Fabrics!

This couch is beyond simple repair and patching, and will require me to remove the works.  I’ll use some of the old material that is still useable (the springs and the frame) but the rest will require something new.  I will do all this work, not certain I will like the final outcome, but knowing that I cannot leave it as it is.

Meanwhile, the sanders work on the house and I wonder if they aren’t a part of a similar experiment.  They’ve removed some of the wood that is hopeless, and have sanded and resanded the wood that can be saved.  If you look closely at the edges where the sanders can fully reach, you can see the layers of paint upon the wood – a colorful visual history of what once was.

We’re in a Recession, the money is extremely tight, and we’re painting the Manse.  I realize that we need to address the problem before it becomes worse (and ends up costing us even more) but I’m still not sure we’ve got our priorities right.  If we attacked the other less visible issues (the non-building issues) in our church (and our denomination!) with the same vigor, I might feel less ambiguous.  It’s as if we are as a church (locally and denominationally) rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.  Scratch that.  We’re reupholstering and repainting and THEN rearranging the chairs on the Titanic

I think it IS time to reupholster and sand and scrape and begin with that framework and structure that is sound – but not on the physical church.  I think we’re at the point where we (again, locally and globally) need to really dig at and tear apart what we have and to begin anew.  Unlike my Freecycle couch, however, there is much at stake.  It is not just the work of our ancestors that may need to be ripped out or re-fitted but it’s some of the more recent work that has been done which our own hands have worked on and touched.  The investment in the Church is far more than the investment in my couch.

Which is why it really shouldn’t sit out there under a tarp for much longer waiting for us to have the time or the initiative.

What would I keep?  What would I rip away? 

What would YOU keep?  What would YOU rip away?

Telling the story…

It’s been an interesting few weeks in worship – at least from the pulpit’s perspective! 

We’ve moved our regular worship service from the Sanctuary to the Chapel as a means of saving $ in air-conditioning costs.  Our Chapel was recently ‘re-claimed’ and renovated, and it is a sweet space if a bit plain visually.  There’s no amplification system – which has proven to be a bit of a challenge at times.  I can boom with the best of ’em, but to do so for the hour we’re there takes a lot of energy.  The muscles around my diaphragm are getting a workout!

I’ve been preaching from Genesis these last few weeks, more or less following the lectionary readings.  It’s the Jacob saga and I’m enjoying it immensely.  The story itself is so rich and so captivating.  I’ve stepped away from the pulpit and have told the story as, well a story… adding emphasis in those places where I’ve discovered something new or different, or where there’s something to be pointed out.  It’s a bit like taking someone on a tour of a garden, and letting them take in the beauty of it, but from time-to-time stopping to point out a particular flower, or the placement of a specific shrub.

I’ve been reminded over these last few weeks of how wonderful the story is, and how there are times when I need not ‘moralize’ the story at the end, but simply let it hang.  It tells itself – and it has for hundereds of generations.

So many times when we (not just me, myself and I) preach, there’s this need to make sure the point is driven home – to make sure that when folks leave, they do so with a practical application.  The problem with that is that there are times when that is inappropriate.  The story is so much more than three points and a punchline.  We do a disservice to the Word as well as to the folks in the pews by making it all so clear.  But the trap is there for those that preach who believe (and perhaps rightly so) that what folks want is a package all tied up with string.

Problem is – what people need is the challenge to make the connections themselves, and to dig deeper into their own theology.  Perhaps this is one of the places where the church has led folks astray – we’ve made it too easy; too accessible;  too akin to pablum. 

This week we’ll be wrestling with angels.  In some ways, I feel like that’s already begun.  :::grin:::

The New Christians

Finished reading The New Christians by Tony Jones last week – and led a discussion group on it at the Perth Amboy Church.  (I was filling in for a friend who had a death in the family).  I’m scheduled to lead a similar group (all from the Presbytery) in early August here in sunny Roselle.

I don’t want to do a book review, but would rather post those areas that resonated with me personally.

The book posits an interesting theory – that there has been a theological and philosophical change in the way we think and process information.  This shift is linked to post-modernism and is marked in part by a desire for a more experiential form of religious expression.  Without all the fancy language and hairy bits – the author suggests that in today’s world folks want to feel religion and not just know it.  Religion has become more relational.  My own response is that of course there’s been a change in how we process information, given the quickly changing context and the advent of artificial intelligence that was bound to happen.  I won’t drag out my Philosophy degree here – but it seems pretty simple.  I’m not sure that Tony Jones has nailed what that particular shift looks like, in part because I think it is still too new for anyone to know.  He refers to his own group as Emergent – those Christians who are emerging in this present time.

My chief criticism of this point is that it is linked specifically to one socio-economic and ethnic group – which he willinging identifies as being generally young, educated and white.  I believe that indeed there is a change in how we think and process information, but that that shift is more global in its reach.  The Emergent experience may very well be what one small group knows to be true, but there are other emerging experiences that are not intellectual, young or white.

There’s other bits in this book as well -some of which are of great value.  One of those bits is the idea that paradox is a part of faith, and that humanity has learned (after slavery, Hitler, etc.) that we can sometimes be wrong.  So, the new Christian says “I believe this to be true with great conviction… but at the same time I’m willing to believe I may be wrong”.  So, when the New Christian enters debate, especially in religious circles, it is done with much humility.  ‘Afterall, I may very well be wrong.’

The final bit is the one that I have struggled with the most.  Tony Jones speaks of being able to do church without doing religion (denomination, buildings, etc.)  Again, there’s a part of me that really resonates with that.  So much of our own church’s budget is tied up in structure (paint, boilers, etc.) that the stewardship of it pains me.  Do I really want to be a part of a church where a huge percentage of the budget goes to the oil guy?  Shouldn’t that money go to those in need?

What Jones does is worship in small house churches – or in bars or cafes.  It’s public, not private, but there’s no physical church structure.  In some ways it is very similar to how the church began, eons ago, when Paul went from place to place and house to house preaching.  People gather there who have left the church years ago, searching for what they experienced that was good in that community.

Jones states (quite plainly) that it will be difficult for clergy (like me) who are in the system to even consider this.  We’ve got pension plans (which he thinks is wrong) and other trappings of ‘professionalism’. 

I disagree.  I point to the hundreds of clergy who leave this profession every year without looking back.  Most of us really have no problem leaving (we struggle more with staying).  And although the structure and the building of the church is a huge weight, when used well I believe it is an asset.  Here, in Roselle, we use our building for the community – indeed, the building itself has become an active part in our mission.

That said, his point is heard and understood.  There’s a fine line between preserving a structure and system to preserve what was… and using that structure and system to tend to the needs of those around us.

But, I’m rambling now. 

Get used to it.  😉

So here’s the thing…

I’ve got a Livejournal, and have had it for many years.  It’s mostly personal – some work – some hobby.  I’ve also got a knitter’s blog over in blogger land.  I keep a diet and fitness journal elsehwere.  (No.  Don’t ask)   I’ve got a Facebook.  A Myspace.  Do I really need another blog?  Can I fragment my life any more than I already have?

Yes.

Yes to the first question – and no to the second.  I do need another blog.  One where I can think out loud regarding the church and the Church as well as my ever-being-reformed theology.  I also need a place where I can park some ideas, and float a few balloons.  It’s not fragmentation – it is FOCUS.  (At least, that’s what I’m calling it today).

There are risks in doing this publically.  Although my theology fits squarely within my Reformed roots, I’m challenged by other ideas and other faith communities.  I’m not syncretic, by any means, but I do learn from other places and it enhances who I am as well as the work that I do where I am.  The risk is that in this soundbyte world it would be easy for my words to be taken out of context and misquoted. 

I’d like to think there’s a risk for the reader as well – especially if the reader is a congregant.  A risk to dig deeper and to grapple and to interact in a way that is not possible in the land where I preach and you listen.  The risk here for you is the possibility (no, the expectancy) that you may preach to me and I may listen.

And we both need that.

Hence – another blog.